Tongariro River Motel
  • Home
  • Booking
  • Location
  • Contact
  • Links
  • Daily Report
September 25, 2018

NZFFA & Fish & Game’s message & DOC’s response….

Proposed Conservation Act Amendments?

The end of freshwater sports fishing?

The New Zealand Federation of Freshwater Anglers is aghast over plans by Greens MP Eugenie Sage to introduce a bill (Conservation [Indigenous freshwater Fish] Act Amendment).

NZFFA President Graham Carter says:

“If this bill goes through as is, it could spell the end of Freshwater Sports Fishing in New Zealand, as it exempts residents who are authorised under the Treaty of Waitangi Act from restrictions on taking, possessing or selling sports fish”

“Next thing we know there will be wholesale netting of trout as they will be worth money and there will be no fish left for the angler who enjoys the activity of sports fishing” Carter says.

The NZFFA have emailed all Angling Clubs imploring them to submit to their members, details of how to respond to this threat.

Furthermore, this has been the subject of some broad social network activity.

Uptake on the facebook page has been widespread and response to club emails has been widely accepted and we are encouraged by their support.

This bill effectively takes any authority away from Fish and Game and plants it with the Department of Conservation. As a group, we find this absurd, where Fish and Game are responsible for the fishing and hunting licences but if this bill goes through, they will have no jurisdiction on the fisheries.

“We expect there to be a huge backlash from the public” says Carter. The Green Party should be worried that their voting public are totally against this bill and that this could cost the Greens severely in the next election.

Similar message from Fish & Game:

Trout and angling under threat

Trout and salmon are facing one of the most serious threats posed to them as a result of new legislation just introduced to Parliament.

The Indigenous Freshwater Fish Amendment Bill aims to provide better protection for indigenous fish such as galaxids, whitebait, eels, bullies, torrent fish, mudfish and other species.

But the Bill also poses a serious threat to trout and angling.

It allows trout and salmon to be removed from particular rivers and lakes, even if they are significant trout and salmon fisheries.

It could see trout being part of Treaty of Waitangi settlements with iwi.

The Bill also opens the possibility of allowing the sale of trout.

What can anglers do?

Fish & Game was not consulted on this Bill and it is vital anglers make their feelings known about it.

Write to the Prime Minister, other party leaders and your MP to tell them the Bill’s attack on trout is unacceptable. Advice on how to do this is here

A suggested letter can be found here.

Visit your MP and tell them what you think.  A list of their electorates can be found here

And above all, make a submission to the select committee now considering the Bill.  

The deadline for making a submission is October 25.

Anglers need to act now to stop the threat in its tracks.

What can you do?

We invite all anglers to write to their local MP and express their concern.

 Click on the sections below for more information along with advice on lobbying MPs, and political chiefs.

Taupo Trout Fishery

The DOC Taupo Fishery Management Team would like to address some of the local angling community’s questions about the impact of the Conservation (Indigenous Freshwater Fish) Amendment Bill on trout fishing.

As passionate anglers ourselves, we appreciate the value of this world class fishery. We can confirm that the Amendment Bill will not directly affect the way the Taupo trout fishery is managed or fishing opportunities available to anglers.

Many Taupo trout anglers also fish in other regions under the management of Fish & Game (F&G). These anglers can be reassured the Bill does not alter the provisions that empower F&G to manage sports fisheries.

The regulations the proposed Bill removes (that required F&G to be consulted, or consent to the movement of aquatic life) were not being used as they had been superseded by another provision in the Conservation Act.

The ability to remove sports fish such as trout and salmon from waterways remains unaffected by the Bill. This rarely used facility already exists and has only been actioned in very specific situations and following thorough consultation with Fish & Game.

The Bill does not enable Treaty partners to own trout, nor does it enable commercial farming of trout.

The Otago Daily Times carried an article on Saturday where Conservation Minister Eugenie Sage responds to concerns:
www.odt.co.nz/…/natio…/sports-fishing-fears-allayed-minister

The Minister has sent the Bill to select committee for public submissions. Anglers are encouraged to read the Conservation Amendment Bill and where concerns exist, make a submission.

Have your say!

In this section:

The threat to trout posed by the Bill
What are the threats to trout and angling in the Indigenous Freshwater Amendment Bill? The Bill seeks to provide better protection…

Trout facts

Trout and other sports fish provide significant recreational, health, environmental and economic benefits to New Zealand as a whole.
Tell your MP what you think

Tell your MP what you think

Members of Parliament have offices in their electorates where voters can go and see them and make their views on...
What to say in your letter or email
What to say in your letter or email
It is important to show to MPs that you are a voter, an angler and that you are firmly opposed…

Make a submission

A Parliamentary Select Committee is an important part of the democratic process and law making. It is where proposed laws are…
Tell the PM and political party leaders what you think
Tell the PM and political party leaders what you think
Public support and a positive profile are important to all politicians who are constantly assessing the political risk and potential…

The following information received from NZFFA.

It is extremely important, and we recommend that you read it all.  

Can you please distribute this to all club members. Urgent attention is required to oppose this bill as it will make the sale of Trout by Maori LEGAL. This is only one amongst many areas of concern as depicted in the attached document. THIS AMENDMENT CANNOT GO THROUGH!!!

Brian Coddington

Independent Consultant to New Zealand Federation of Freshwater Anglers Inc

Email: comms@nzffa.co.nz

Web site: www.nzffa.co.nzFacebook: www.facebook.com/nzffa

 

Resource material from F&G NZ on the threat to trout and fishing from the proposed Conservation Act Amendment.

  1. Trout are a valuable resource
  2. The threat to trout posed by the Bill
  3. What you can do:
    1. Tell Political Leaders what you think
    2. Making a Submission
    3. Tell your MP what you think
      1. What to say
      2. Draft letter

Trout are a valuable resource

TROUT FACTS

Trout and other sports fish provide significant recreational, health, environmental and economic benefits to New Zealand as a whole.

  • More than 110 thousand people buy trout fishing licences every year
  • Anglers are from all walks of New Zealand life
  • Fishing puts food on the table of average Kiwi family
  • Fishing provides relaxation and exercise, contributing to physical and mental health and wellbeing
  • Trout are an iconic species which provides economic, cultural and health benefit
  • Trout benefit the environment through Fish & Game’s advocacy work
  • ECONOMIC BENEFIT OF TROUT

  • Trout provide a significant economic boost to regional economies.
  • Trout contribute significantly to tourism revenue, international and domestic
  • Cawthron Institute put the value of trout angling in 1991 at up to a quarter of a billion dollars – that’s $400 million today. But Cawthron says that value may even be higher in 2018 as the trout industry has grown significantly since 1991
  • New Zealand’s brown trout fishing is regarded as one of the world’s best, attracting big spending international anglers.
  • New Zealand is one of the “must fish” destinations on these wealthy anglers’ itineraries.
  • An industry has developed to service the hunger to fish for trout – guides, accommodation, lodges and helicopter services all provide jobs
  • Many of these jobs are in regions where unemployment is higher
  • Business activity by sports retail stores and fishing tackle manufacturers provides jobs and a boost to the economy
  • ENVIRONMENTAL VALUE OF TROUT

  • Trout need clean water – native fish need clean water
  • Trout are the canaries in the coal mine when it comes to spotlighting environmental harm caused by human activity
  • Falling trout populations and dirty streams and rivers have raised alarm bells about the impact of industrial farming
  • Money from trout licences has been used to fight for clean water and protect the environment
  • Fish & Game has spent millions of dollars raised from trout licence sales on scientific research and legal battles to protect the environment
  • Trout dollars have protected rivers and lakes through Water Conservation Orders – 12 out of 15 existing Water Conservation Orders have been secured by Fish & Game
  • This work and advocacy protects migratory galaxids
  • Recent drift dives in Marlborough’s Waihopai and Branch rivers show Canterbury galaxids and brown and rainbow trout living side by side – the key difference is that these rivers are not subject to intensive farming
  • Fish & Game’s statutory responsibility to manage trout has made it this country’s most active, committed and successful environmental organisations. This benefits the environment and native species.
  • ACTUAL SOURCE OF THREAT TO NATIVE FISH•

  • Human activity is the real threat to native fish
  • Research shows a 50-90% reduction on native fish distribution within their study range, due to “intensive agricultural land use downstream”
  • This harmful environmental degradation can be caused by seen industrial farming, draining of wetlands, blocking and diverting stream and river flows, irrigation, excessive fertiliser and nitrogen run off into waterways, sedimentation from poor primary industry activity and inadequate sewage treatment
  • Uncontrolled commercial harvest of whitebait has an impact on indigenous freshwater fish populations
  • TROUT’S PLACE IN NEW ZEALAND CULTURE

• Trout have been in New Zealand for more than 150 years.  Despite public perception, experts say the galaxid species in the whitebait fishery are not endangered, nor has their extinction risk been assessed.

  • They are deemed to be a desirable ‘naturalised’ introduced species protected by New Zealand law.
  • Trout’s desirable species classification stems from its cultural, economic and recreational value.
  • Long tradition of trout fishing in New Zealand
  • Trout provide food, recreation and connection with the outdoors with physical and mental health benefits
  • The value of trout is legally recognised through statutory protection under the Conservation Act and Freshwater Fisheries Regulations.The threat to trout posed by the Bill
  • WHAT ARE THE THREATS TO TROUT AND ANGLING IN THE INDIGENOUS FRESHWATER FISH AMENDMENT BILL?
  • The Amendment Bill seeks to provide better protection for indigenous freshwater fish.These fish species include whitebait, also known as galaxids, eels, bullies, torrent fish, mud fish and others.The full detail of the amendment bill can be found here; http://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2018/0087/latest/LMS73110.html
    Fish & Game supports efforts to provide better protection for indigenous freshwater fish.However, that should not be at the expense of trout and other freshwater sports fish, nor the more than hundred thousand anglers who value these fish for the recreational, cultural and economic benefits they provide.The Amendment Bill as it is now written contains several aspects which pose a threat to trout fishing in New Zealand.Clause 5:
  • Clause 5 gives DoC’s freshwater fisheries management plans priority over Fish & Game’s fish and game management plans.
  • Clause 5 allows the Minister to adopt a national freshwater fisheries management plan which prevails over Fish & Game management plans.
  • This is despite both plans having the same legal status under the Act.
  • Clause 5 would allow DoC to remove all trout and salmon from particular rivers or lakes, even if those waterways have been identified as significant trout and salmon habitat. This is likely to result in catchments where DoC, Iwi and regional councils can establish management regimes which exclude trout.

Clause 6:

  • Clause 6 exempts anyone authorised under Treaty settlement legislation from restrictions on taking, possessing or selling sportsfish.
  • Clause 6 allows the Crown and iwi to set aside present rules as part of a treaty settlement.
  • Clause 6 allows the removal of present bans on the sale of fishing rights.
  • Clause 6 allows the removal of present bans on the sale of sports fish.
  • Clause 6 removes the requirement for occupiers of land to comply with trout fishing rules and regulations, although they would still need a licence.
  • Clause 6 opens up the potential for direct conflict between Treaty settlement legislation and sports fishing.Clause 17:
  • Clause 17 revokes several existing regulations allowing Fish & Game to manage trout and other sports fish.
  • In particular, Clause 17 would no longer require a Fish & Game region’s consent for the release of fish or ova, or transfer of sports fish and ova between the North and South Islands.
  • The Bill reduces Fish & Game’s right to be consulted as managers of sports fish to the same level as any member of the public.
  • What YOU can do:

  • Tell Political Leaders what you thinkTELLING THE PRIME MINISTER AND POLITICAL PARTY LEADERS WHAT YOU THINKPublic support and a positive profile are important to all politicians who are constantly assessing the political risk and potential fallout of any decision they make.As a result, they are always sensitive to unpopular or controversial legislation, so it pays to let them know what your views are.Write a letter to the Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and tell her you are unhappy with the threat to trout and your recreational angling posed by the Conservation (Indigenous Freshwater Fish) Amendment Bill.

Also write letters to the leaders of the other two parties which make up the present coalition government and tell them of your opposition to the Bill.

The leaders of those parties are Winston Peters of New Zealand First and James Shaw or Marama Davidson are co-leaders of the Greens.

If you are member of the Labour, NZ First or Greens parties, tell the leaders and say that you are unhappy with the way the Amendment Bill threatens trout, your angling and undermines Fish & Game.

If you voted for Labour, NZ First or the Greens, tell the leaders you have supported them in the past but warn they can’t count on your vote if the Amendment Bill goes through as it presently stands.

The National Party is the main Opposition party, so write to National’s leader Simon Bridges and tell him of your unhappiness with the Amendment Bill and ask him to change it.

Sending a letter to the party leaders is easy and you don’t have to buy a stamp to do it as any correspondence to a politician is free of charge.

The address to write to the leaders is;

You can also email your concerns to the Party leaders.

Private Bag 18888

Parliament Buildings

Wellington 6160

Labour
New Zealand First Greens

National Party ACT

Jacinda Ardern j.ardern@ministers.govt.nz Winston Peters w.peters@ministers.govt.nz

James Shaw j.shaw@ministers.govt.nz
Marama Davidson Marama.Davidson@parliament.govt.nz

Simon Bridges simon.bridges@parliament.govt.nz David Seymour david.seymour@parliament.govt.nz

MAKING A SUBMISSION TO A SELECT COMMITTEE

A Parliamentary Select Committee is an important part of the democratic process and law making.

It is where proposed laws are scrutinised and debated by the Members of Parliament who sit on the committee. It is a chance to fix any mistakes, oversights or omissions in the draft legislation and avoid any unintended consequences if it was introduced.

More importantly, it provides the opportunity for any New Zealander to have their say on a proposed piece of legislation by making a submission. This ensures MPs are fully informed about the impact the new law they are considering will have on the public.

It also provides them with an opportunity to see how popular or unpopular a new law is and gauge any potential political backlash.

These submissions are made in writing but anyone who is making a submission can also ask to make a verbal presentation to the Select Committee.

Submissions on the Conservation (Indigenous Freshwater Fish) Amendment Bill are now open and close on October 25.

Parliament’s website contains detailed advice on making a submission to a Select Committee.

https://www.parliament.nz/media/2019/makingasubmission2012-2.pdf

Here is the link to the Environment Select Committee and the Conservation (Indigenous Freshwater Fish) Amendment Bill.

https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/sc/make-a- submission/document/52SCEN_SCF_BILL_79000/conservation-indigenous-freshwater-fish- amendment-bill

A template for making a submission is here;

https://www.parliament.nz/en/ECommitteeSubmission/52SCEN_SCF_BILL_79000/CreateSubm ission

The full text of the Conservation (Indigenous Freshwater Fish) Amendment Bill can be read here;

http://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2018/0087/latest/LMS73110.html

TELLING YOUR MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT WHAT YOU THINK

Members of Parliament have offices in their electorates where voters can go and see them and make their views on issues known.

You will usually have to make an appointment to see them.

These offices are paid for by you the taxpayer to provide this opportunity and ask for help from your local MP.

If you don’t know who your MP is, you can find out here;

https://www.parliament.nz/en/mps-and-electorates/members-of-parliament/

You can also write a letter to your local MP expressing your concern and asking them to change the legislation.

Contact details can be found here;

https://www.parliament.nz/en/get-involved/have-your-say/contact-an-mp/

For advice on what to say in your letter, see below;

Don’t worry about the cost of posting a letter, any correspondence to a MP is free of charge. The address to write to them is;

Private Bag 18888

Parliament Buildings

Wellington 6160

There is also the opportunity to have your letter delivered to all 121 MPs now sitting in Parliament.

If you want to do this, send Parliament, 121 copies of your letter in one envelope. Include a covering note asking for a copy to be distributed to each MP.

Address your envelope:

All members of Parliament Care of Distribution Services Freepost Parliament
Private Bag 18 888 Parliament Buildings Wellington 6160

This service is available only for letters, not emails.

WHAT TO SAY IN YOUR LETTER OR EMAIL

It is important to show to MPs that you are a voter, an angler and that you are firmly opposed to the Amendment Bill’s threat to trout and your recreational enjoyment.

Say who you are, where you live, your age and profession.

Tell them how you got started in fishing, the generations of your family who have fished and that you are teaching the next generation the skills handed to you.

Say how fishing allows you to put food on your family’s table.

Point out that you as a trout angler have fought long and hard to protect the environment and campaigned for clean water. Stress that you have put your money where your mouth is on protecting the environment.

If you are member of the Labour, NZ First or Greens parties, tell the leaders and say that you are unhappy with the way the Amendment Bill threatens trout, your angling and undermines Fish & Game.

If you voted for Labour, NZ First or the Greens, tell the leaders you have supported them in the past but warn they can’t count on your vote if the Amendment Bill goes through as it presently stands.

The tone of your letter should be firm but polite. Aim to get your message across in a reasoned way and stress how important angling and trout are to you and your family.

Draft letter to MP’s

September 2018

Dear Hon ……. MP,

I am writing to express my concern about the Conservation (Indigenous Freshwater Fish) Amendment Bill.

My concerns are over both the contents of the Bill and the lack of consultation on it.

I am deeply disturbed by the secrecy under which this Bill was prepared and the failure to consult with Fish & Game about this issue when Fish & Game is the statutory manager of trout and represents my interests in these matters.

I agree with the Bill’s intention to better protect native fish but don’t support its attempt to undermine Fish & Game, my interests and the future of trout in New Zealand.

Trout are a valuable introduced species which provide economic, cultural and health benefits to me and more than a hundred thousand other freshwater licence holders every year.

As a keen angler, I value the relaxation, exercise and mental health wellbeing fishing provides and I believe the proposed legislation is aimed at removing those enjoyments and recreation opportunities from me and my fellow licence holders.

I ask that you change the Bill as it now stands to ensure that native fish get the protection they deserve but this protection is not to the detriment of trout or the enjoyment I and many others get from fishing for them,

Yours sincerely,

 

An opinion from Herb Spanngl

It beggars belief that this Labour led coalition, which only governs with a paper thin majority and already has trouble singing from the same song sheet should be deranged enough to now wants to alienate 100000 trout and salmon anglers with its toxic amendments to the Conservation Act, the worst of them are outlined below:

  • Clause 6 exempts anyone authorised under Treaty settlement legislation from restrictions on taking, possessing or selling sportsfish.
  • Clause 6 allows the Crown and iwi to set aside present rules as part of a treaty settlement.
  • Clause 6 allows the removal of present bans on the sale of fishing rights.
  • Clause 6 allows the removal of present bans on the sale of sports fish.
  • Clause 6 removes the requirement for occupiers of land to comply with trout fishing rules and regulations, although they would still need a licence.
  • Clause 6 opens up the potential for direct conflict between Treaty settlement legislation and sports fishing.

While this bill, promoted by Green Party Conservation Minister Eugene Sage, claims to protect native fish it does so by demonising trout and salmon (and by association Fish and Game, which manages these sport fisheries) as the prime threat to native fish survival.   However, it is quite ironic that this coalition now targets trout as pest fish while still allowing the commercial slaughter of whitebait and eels and the ongoing destruction of aquatic wildlife habitats. Reading clause 6 and some other clauses it is quite clear that this coalition has chosen that the best way to destroy trout and salmon is to destroy Fish and Game Councils that are the statutory managers of the publicly owned fresh water fish and game resource. Part of this multi prong attack on F&G is to designate trout and salmon as bargaining chips for treaty settlement. Let me remind these Green Party Morris Dancers that F&G has already championed the fight for clean rivers, water conservation orders and protection of wetlands when the Founder Greenies were still stoned on dope at their Coromandel communes. Over several decades F&G license holders have spent millions on publicity and court action to protect our precious lakes and rivers. License-holder stats show that of the 100000 plus anglers the vast majority are men and many of them are in their second half of life. Only a self deluded administration would assail for no good reason this senior, conscientious voter constituency that has the power to make or break governments.

Herb Spannagl

New Plymouth

Wrap your head round this…

New Zealand People’s Mandate Party·Sunday, September 16, 2018
Opinion piece by Robbie Kaiviti.
I hear hunters saying of 1080, that the Department of Conservation and other agencies who are carpet bombing our nation with the deadly eco-toxin, are killing deer and will destroy both recreational hunting and our hunting industry, if these agencies continue. What you need to do is wrap your heads round this. The Department of Conservation will kill every deer, every pig, every chamois, every tahr, every goat, every feral sheep and cattle beast. Every stoat, every rabbit, every possum. Every cat, rat and elephant, and yes, they will kill the fabled unicorn if they can find one, or indeed, the legendary Fiordland moose. When they are done with them, they will start on ducks, geese and perhaps even our introduced hawks, and they will start looking hard at what plants we have in our gardens.
You see, DoC does not give a flying fig about your sport. The hard truth is, if it is not native then DoC and the Green Party believe it doesn’t belong. The only good import is a dead import. Inside DoC there reigns a secret agenda, a view held at the most senior levels of the department. It resolves around one overriding philosophical imperative, ridding NZ of all introduced species, no exceptions. Does that sound Nutty? It is nutty, but then, I kinda think we are dealing with nuts.
When Doc was formed, a small core of highly radicalised, fundamentalist conservationists infiltrated the new department. Some were senior national parks rangers, some administrators, and they now hold power at the top levels of DoC. Predator Free NZ is their invention. This I will come back to in a moment. They have looked for years for a way to push their radical agenda along and their tool is increased 1080 drops. Eugenie Sage is one of these zealots and her partner Richard Suggate is a long serving DoC manager, so no conflict of interest there. Those radicalised fundamentalists must think themselves sitting pretty now, able to push forward their plans with ample help from a very sympathetic Minister of Conservation. Sage, quite literally, has her hands on the job. I don’t want to talk about what parts she has her hands on, because as far as I am concerned what happens in her bedroom, should stay in her bedroom. But it is clear her relationship with her department is a warm, if not a rather cuddly one. For DoC and their minister, Predator Free NZ is a master stroke. With all the publicity, the Predator Free NZ initiative successfully sucks in the public, so they think they and DoC are doing gods work. It is a brilliantly conceived plan and a wonderful piece of propaganda. It is horse pucky, because it cannot work, but it is a brilliant piece of thinking if you want to rain 1080 into our environment.
How do I know all this. I know because I was a senior national parks ranger. I finished my time with the National Parks Service just prior to DoC’s formation. I sat in on meetings where these clowns talked about their final solution in whispered tones. They made it clear that what was being talked about was not for the general consumption of more junior staff or the public. After leaving the service I continued in conservation, doing mostly my own thing, disillusioned with what I have seen going on in the likes of Forest & Bird, and Greenpeace. I wanted nothing to do with them and I wanted nothing to do with DoC. It is interesting that Greenpeace NZ is pro 1080. But then their head is Russel Norman, former leader of the Green Party. The head of Forest & Bird is Kevin Hague, formally of the Green Party and guess what, they are pro 1080. However, I kept in close contact with a number of DoC staff at all levels of the organisation. I saw those very people I used to sit with in those meetings, take up senior appointments inside DoC. I have been privy to the continuing radicalisation of the department. It has taken them decades but right now, unless people understand what is going on inside DoC and inside government, they will continue push their hidden agenda to the bitter end, if unchallenged.
I hope dear hunters, whether you hunt with rifle or camera, that we don’t all end up lamenting the day we saw our last deer, and allowed a few radicals to dictate what conservation should look like in this country.
Predator Free cannot work, it is a pipe dream, but that is another story and not the subject of this little article. But I just want to leave you all with one parting shot, I usually only need one. When DoC claims we had no grazing animals in this country, what the hell do they think Moa did?
Robbie Kaiviti.
New Zealand People’s Mandate Party.
UPDATE: When I published this article, I was subject of abusive and sometimes threatening comments and messages from the pro-1080 camp, which is very definitely their style. The common thread was that I am a dickhead and government is not targeting any large animals in this country. Just two days after publishing, I find out government has announced they are going to cull 7,500 Tahr in the first year of a two year program. Estimates of the Tahr population is around 35,000 animals. However, I am not inclined to accept official figures because DoC made bizarrely ridiculous claims about the number of possums in this country. Unreviewed figures that come from official sources must be taken with a heaped spoonful of disbelief, because government often inflates numbers to justify what they want to do, and that is kill non-native species, all of them.
This cull might be justified under normal circumstances but not when there is a clear, but unpublicised agenda to both kill all non-native species, and not inform the public of the real plan. We have no substantiated figures on how many of our large animals have fallen to 1080.
Update: Trout and salmon are facing one of the most serious threats posed to them as a result of new legislation just introduced to Parliament.
https://fishandgame.org.nz/northcanterbury/threat-to-trout/
To those who choose to doubt what I say and use insult as their argument, which sadly seems to be most, take a deep breath, count to ten, and then have a good hard look at what is happening round you. And then wake the hell up!
Robbie.
Previous StoryTurangi traffic congestion on SH1 bridge…
Next StoryNZ Veteran Golf Association?
January 2021
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Dec    
  • Home
  • Booking
  • Location
  • Contact
  • Links
  • Daily Report

Site and hosting by iConcept | Copyright © Tongariro River Motel